“Islamic Republic of Pakistan”, yes its the complete name of our beloved country, and what does it apparently suggest? It is an Islamic state where Government will be elected by majority of the public, and those elected will form the constitution of the country. But those Laws should be with in the limits of Islamic knowledge or “Sharia”, as it’s an Islamic state. So, we are trying to implement Islamic Laws but by following the democratic approach; where majority is the authority. Do you think its possible?
Lets briefly examine both approaches to answer this question. Sharia tells us to have a pious leader as a supreme authority, and he would be the ultimate authority to approve or reject the suggestions given by the advisories, in short his words are the constitution.But problem arose with the word “Pious”, there are too much pious “Mullahs” in our society that its kind of impossible to find a supreme among them. Now to eradicate this issue we moved on to democracy.
Now democracy suggests us to vote the persons from the society as your representatives to formulate the constitution of our state, and it should must preserve the Rights of the minorities. It sounds quite nice, but complications begin when its come to the way of formulating Laws. Democracy allows to pass any bill as Law which is approved by the majority of the representatives, but what about the resolutions like homosexual marriages, female’s equal inheritance, domestic violence acts, bank interest? Remember we have to maintain our state Islamic as well and such laws somehow violates Islamic boundaries, so they must not be the part of our constitution.
It seems we are in a serious problem, neither we are purely Islamic nor Democratic. It confuses the nation, whether to idealize nations like U.S.A or Briton or Islamic states like Saudi Arabia or Bahrain. Its true both boats have their own problems but at least sailing a boat is much easier and intuitive than two.